Is this “Caprisorn One” reinvented, or maybe there is some truth to the question? Senator Johnson has urged Congress to reexamine the 9/11 investigation, particularly the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. Family members of those who were killed have urged the senator to look into it. Johnson charges the National Institute of Standards and Technology with conducting “corruption” investigations.
Johnson challenges the official narrative of Building 7
Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) has sparked controversy by calling for Congress to reopen investigations into the events of September 11, 2001, with particular attention to World Trade Center Building 7. Unlike the Twin Towers, Building 7 was not struck by an aircraft but still collapsed completely later that day. Johnson has criticized the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), claiming their investigation into the building’s collapse was “corrupt” and failed to provide adequate explanations for what actually occurred.
The Wisconsin senator has specifically questioned the official conclusion that Building 7 collapsed due to fire damage only. Instead, he suggests that the 47-story structure was brought down through controlled demolition, a theory that some skeptics have held for years. Johnson’s remarks reflect growing dissatisfaction among certain groups who believe critical evidence from the 9/11 attacks was mishandled or purposefully destroyed during the initial investigation stages.
Breaking Global Bombshell! 9/11 Was A Deep State Inside Job Says U.S. Senator Ron Johnson.
The Controlled Demolition of Building 7 Is The Irrefutable Smoking Gun Proving That 9/11 Was A State Sponsored Terror Attack Organized By The U.S. And Other Nations Who Wanted A Pretext To… pic.twitter.com/Itx3PnKxfF
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) April 21, 2025
People Seeking Clarity and Truth
Johnson’s push for a new investigation includes accusations that the original inquiry amounted to a cover-up. He has specifically raised concerns about the rapid removal and destruction of structural evidence from the collapse sites, which some critics argue prevented thorough forensic analysis. The senator’s comments have reinvigorated discussions about potential gaps in the official narrative of the 9/11 attacks that killed nearly 3,000 Americans and launched major military operations overseas.
Support for Johnson’s position has come from former Congressman Curt Weldon, who has joined calls for establishing a new commission to study the facts behind the attacks. Weldon believes that after more than two decades, Americans deserve complete transparency about what transpired on September 11, 2001. Both Johnson and Weldon have suggested that former President Donald Trump could potentially play a significant role in bringing new transparency to the investigation if given the opportunity.
HAS HE TOTALLY LOST IT?
Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson said in an interview that 9/11 was an inside job and he wants to hold Senate hearings on the cover up.
Your thoughts? pic.twitter.com/1znbzvb88K
— Lovable Liberal and his Old English sheepdog (@DougWahl1) April 21, 2025
Victims’ Families Want Answers
According to reports, 9/11 victims’ families have contacted Senator Johnson to support his efforts and request the release of unredacted FBI files related to the attacks. These families have long sought more information about possible foreign involvement in the attack’s planning and execution. Johnson has suggested that there may be deeper intelligence community connections to the events than what has previously been revealed to the American people.
The senator has hinted at the possibility of public hearings on the subject, implying that the time has come for Americans to learn the full story of 9/11. While Johnson’s statements have received support from those who question the official narrative, they have also been criticized by those who believe he is promoting conspiracy theories about a national tragedy. The debate emphasizes the ongoing conflict between government transparency and official accounts of pivotal historical events.